HAIL and SB 690 address different rules.

A federal commercial-purpose proposal and California’s narrower online pen-register measure should be explained on their own terms.

Official record checked September 25, 2026, at 18:14 UTC.
SB 690 passed the Legislature on August 28. The official record still shows it enrolled with the Governor; its last recorded action is September 4 presentment. No signature date or chapter number was located. Official status · Official history.
QuestionHAIL · H.R. 10263California · SB 690
Which rules?Specified federal and state surveillance-law claims and enforcement.Certain civil actions under Penal Code §637.2 for §638.51 conduct alleged to arise on websites or online/mobile applications.
Core approachBroad commercial-purpose bar for covered collection, processing and disclosure.Reserves this identified civil-action route to the Attorney General. The enrolled restriction has no commercial-purpose or small-business qualifier.
Pending proceedingsIntroduced text reaches covered proceedings already underway.Enrolled text reaches pending claims in actions commenced within two years before the operative date. It measures when the action began, not when a visit occurred.
Important boundaryNot limited to small businesses or claims found frivolous.Does not amend §§631 or 632, or repeal §638.51. The targeted civil-action restriction does not remove criminal enforcement.

An effective date is a separate question.

If enacted this September, the enrolled non-urgency bill’s ordinary effective and operative date would be January 1, 2027. That is a conditional inference from California’s constitutional default, not a verified enacted date. Under that assumption, the pending-action commencement window would begin January 1, 2025.

September 30 is the applicable Governor action deadline, not the effective date. Official feeds can lag; check the primary record for later actions.