Rep. Russ Fulcher
Introduced the Halt Abusive Internet Lawsuits Act of 2026 on September 3. The official record identifies the bill and its referral to House Judiciary.
We support the HAIL Act and clearer rules for responsible digital commerce. The organizations listed here bring different perspectives on how website litigation affects businesses and the communities they serve.
This coalition supports the HAIL Act.
LiveRamp funds and operates this website and publishes it on behalf of the coalition. About this project.
Funded, operated and published by LiveRamp on behalf of the coalition. Production, hosting and editorial responsibility.
Interested in joining the Coalition to Halt Abusive Internet Lawsuits? Contact the coalition.


















Public statements · Checked September 25, 2026
Published positions on the HAIL Act and related reforms.
Introduced the Halt Abusive Internet Lawsuits Act of 2026 on September 3. The official record identifies the bill and its referral to House Judiciary.
Law-firm commentary · September 14, 2026
A published client alert urges businesses to seek their representatives’ support for HAIL. It describes the federal proposal as broader relief following California’s narrower SB 690 compromise.
Opinion · The Hill · September 25, 2026
Rep. Roger Williams describes the costs facing small businesses and argues for federal reform, discussing HAIL alongside California’s narrower response.
Read Williams’s opinion columnCommentary, state-bill support and court filings address different aspects of reform. The subject of each statement is identified below.
NRF executive vice president of government relations · September 2026
In the Ripon Forum, French calls for congressional action on website wiretap litigation and describes uncertainty across state and federal laws.
SB 690 support · August 12, 2025 version context
A signed letter supports California’s SB 690 and argues for clearer treatment of commercial data use and pending cases.
January 22, 2025
In Gutierrez v. Converse, the organizations filed an amicus brief seeking appellate clarification of the first clause of CIPA §631(a) as applied to the internet.