The coalition

We support the HAIL Act and clearer rules for responsible digital commerce. The organizations listed here bring different perspectives on how website litigation affects businesses and the communities they serve.

This coalition supports the HAIL Act.

LiveRamp funds and operates this website and publishes it on behalf of the coalition. About this project.

Funded, operated and published by LiveRamp on behalf of the coalition. Production, hosting and editorial responsibility.

Interested in joining the Coalition to Halt Abusive Internet Lawsuits? Contact the coalition.

Public statements · Checked September 25, 2026

The HAIL Act

Published positions on the HAIL Act and related reforms.

Bill sponsor

Rep. Russ Fulcher

Introduced the Halt Abusive Internet Lawsuits Act of 2026 on September 3. The official record identifies the bill and its referral to House Judiciary.

Published support for HAIL

Steptoe LLP

Law-firm commentary · September 14, 2026

A published client alert urges businesses to seek their representatives’ support for HAIL. It describes the federal proposal as broader relief following California’s narrower SB 690 compromise.

Opinion · The Hill · September 25, 2026

Stop the wiretap shakedown on Main Street

Rep. Roger Williams describes the costs facing small businesses and argues for federal reform, discussing HAIL alongside California’s narrower response.

Read Williams’s opinion column

Related reform positions

Commentary, state-bill support and court filings address different aspects of reform. The subject of each statement is identified below.

Federal reform commentary

David French

NRF executive vice president of government relations · September 2026

In the Ripon Forum, French calls for congressional action on website wiretap litigation and describes uncertainty across state and federal laws.

Earlier SB 690 support

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

SB 690 support · August 12, 2025 version context

A signed letter supports California’s SB 690 and argues for clearer treatment of commercial data use and pending cases.

Court filing · CIPA §631 interpretation

Retail Litigation Center & U.S. Chamber

January 22, 2025

In Gutierrez v. Converse, the organizations filed an amicus brief seeking appellate clarification of the first clause of CIPA §631(a) as applied to the internet.

Read the coalition’s positions